View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2008, 12:46 PM
BlueIceDragon's Avatar
BlueIceDragon BlueIceDragon is offline
Senior Member
Points: 1,569, Level: 23
Points: 1,569, Level: 23 Points: 1,569, Level: 23 Points: 1,569, Level: 23
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 27
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BlueIceDragon is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to BlueIceDragon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbgb View Post
I heard that science is never certain. It's based on a bunch of theories and hypotheses that are constantly being tested against. That's just what I heard, I'm no scientist.

What do y'all think about global warming? Just curious.
lol. yes... all science depends on 'proof' and 'fact' and hypotheses (when things cannot be definitively proven). Thus the difference between hypothesis, theory, and a law. I just find it amusing that evolution is treated as a 'law' when it cannot be proven, and should actually be a hypothesis not a theory.

Anyhow, I'm definitely a global warming sceptic just like I'm a "world overpopulation" sceptic. That said, I am all in favour of using resources wisely and not raping the world. So... I am keen on seeing if and how this global warming myth improves that.
__________________
For Kitangel: One heart, one love, forever!
Reply With Quote