View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 04:52 AM
DMcKay's Avatar
DMcKay DMcKay is offline
Senior Member
Points: 5,785, Level: 52
Points: 5,785, Level: 52 Points: 5,785, Level: 52 Points: 5,785, Level: 52
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 56
Posts: 1,729
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DMcKay is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RestoreTheRiver View Post
This is a excellent idea. I fully agree that scripture should be the foundation of the definitions in our glossary of terms. Given that, there are terms where there is more than one responsible perspective as to the scripturally based definition. Will more than one perspective be welcome, and represented, in the glossary?

Michael
Michael,

I think that the answer to that depends on the term or terms themselves. I think that for the most part Biblical terms are going to have a single meaning. If there is more than one definition it will depend on whether or not it is Biblical.

Don M
__________________
Ecclesiastes 10:2 *(NASB)
Democracy is more dangerous than fire. Fire can't vote itself immune to water.

Acts 20:24 But I do not consider my life of any account as dear to myself, in order that I may finish my course, and the ministry which I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify solemnly of the gospel of the grace of God.
Reply With Quote